A lot of arm-chair Nadal fanboys keep touting the stat that in Grand Slams, Nadal has a 5-2 head to head record against Federer and hence Federer hasn’t “dominated” Rafa.
But these guys completely miss the point (which all tennis legends like Sampras, Agassi, Laver, Mcenroe and Becker accept):
Nadal didn’t even make ONE U.S. Open final during Federer’s reign!!!
ZILCH. ZERO. Not ONE SINGLE final in the 5 YEARS Federer won.
Why should we bother about Federer losing to Nadal, if we don’t scrutinize Nadal losing to weak players in US and Aus Opens? In fact, Nadal lost to way lower ranked Soderling in 4th round of his FAVOURITE surface after winning 4 times. Federer has lost ONLY in the finals of Wimbledon since his 1st win in 2003 and NEVER lost US Open after he first won it in 2004.
Nadal is extremely inconsistent in Hardcourt Slams.
Considering Roger’s awesome hardcourt Slam record, the head to head would easily be in FEDERER’s favour of at least 8-5 (4 US Open wins and 2 Aus Open wins in Federer’s prime).
By refusing to acknowledge Nadal’s miserable hard court slam record, and refusing to see Federer’s total dominance in US Open, the head -to-head stat supporters are PUNISHING Federer for his CONSISTENCY in reaching FINALS of ALL slams, and REWARDING Nadal for his failure in U.S.Open and Aus Open.
Absolutely ridiculous. Basically Nadal fanboys have been devastated by Federer’s French open win and the fact that he has been declared the Greatest Tennis Player of ALL Time by none other than Sampras, Agassi, Lendl, McEnroe etc etc.
The right way to check slam dominance, is to take up ALL THE SLAMS in which BOTH Nadal and Federer participated and check the winning percentage you find that Nadal is way inferior to Federer than Agassi was to Sampras (and not otherwise as Nadal fanboys love to believe). When you add the 2 Wimbledons, 4 Aus Opens and 5 US Opens that Nadal and Federer haven’t met in, but Federer won 2 , 3 & 5 of those Slams respectively, you get the TRUE picture.
Over time, Federer will dominate sports history books, while Nadal may remain a footnote (unless he starts winning 10more slams…)
Also read: how-nadal-maintains-his-head-to-head-record-against-federer
To quote a fellow tennis enthusiast & blogger (see comments section below): “…Roger leads (Rafa) 29-20 and 35-23, in the Same Tournament Entered and the Titles in Total Tournaments Available, respectively. On top of that Roger leads 12-6 in the Same 21 Grand Slams Played.”
This is an awesome stat and once and for all makes the lousy “Roger didn’t dominate Rafa” argument completely untenable. Read the full analysis here which debunks the popular myth that Roger never dominated Rafa. A better and more statistically valid data set to measure GOAT and true Grand Slam head to head is the above mentioned “Same 21 Grand Slams Played”. Click here to read more: There’s More to Nadal and Federer Than Head-To-Head Meetings
Filed under: Sport , 21 Grand Slams Played, 5 U.S.Open wins in a row, Australian Open, Becker, Bjorn Borg, bleacher report, bleacherreport, bleacherreport.com, Federer, Federer better than Nadal, Federer is greatest if all time, Federer Nadal rivalry, federer stats, Federer–Nadal_rivalry, Grand Slam, Grass courts, hard court, Hardcourt slams, hardcourts, inconsistent Nadal, ivan lendl, John Mcenroe, lendl, misleading, Nadal, Nadal failure in US Open, Nadal Federer rivalry, nadal head to head, nadal stats, nadal US Open flop, Pete Sampras, rafa roger head to head, Rafael Nadal, Rod Laver, Roger Federer, roger rafa head to head, Same 21 Grand Slams Played, Same Tournament Entered, sampras, truth about statistics, U.S. Open
Pete Sampras has recently said that, “Tough question to answer. I do understand the argument as being the best ever you have to be the best of your generation and Federer has come up short against Nadal” .
At times, the H2H interpretation has been analogous to a conspiracy theory. For example, Federer critics go as far as to suggest, “You can make a clear case Federer is not even the best of this time” (Raymond Lee, Tennis Week 7/14/2009).
Don’t worry. Here is an answer to these critics.
Yes, Rafa leads 13-7, but Roger leads 29-20 and 35-23, in the Same Tournament Entered and the Titles in Total Tournaments Available, respectively. On top of that Roger leads 12-6 in the Same 21 Grand Slams Played.
See the article below for the most comprehensive evaluation and flaw in the interpretation of Federer-Nadal head-to-head matchup.
This is the most detailed and satisfactory article ever written to counter Federer’s critics.
The article is in Bleacher Report, with the title
Face the Facts: There’s More to Nadal and Federer Than Head-To-Head Meetings
bleacherreport.com/articles/226249-logical-flaw-in-the-interpretation-of-rafas-13-7-h2h
Copy and paste the URL.
Or, you can Google up the title if the link does not work or does not show up
http://bleacherreport.com/users/131440-xeno-philous-f
Hugely biased article, you just assume fed would have beaten nadal in usopen finals. I bet you assumed he was gonna beat him in the aopen final, also, you didn’t think he would ever lose to nadal in wimby. Who is the GOAT is a very stupid question, that’s the inly reason I dislike fed, because he always says he wants to be the GOAT. Nadal is better in H2H, while fed is better in GS’s, simple as that.
And I would bet my house on it, this is the way is gonna be forever. Nadal won’t surpass fed in GS’s because he’ll burn out, but fed will never have a winning H2H against nadal, because nadal is he’s deamon.
Face it, Federer is rubbish. Nadal owns him.